Stockport Council is making its third attempt in four years to get funding from the Government for the A6-M60 Bypass. Requests in 2016 and 2018 for money for further preparatory work were turned down. The latest application, submitted last March, is for funding for the whole project, officially costed at £477 million.
In its application form, the Council said that the Greater Manchester Combined Authority would provide the mandatory “local contribution” of £70 million towards the cost. Up to June 18th, the Authority has not agreed to do so. Should it even be asked? Its transport capital funds ought to be spent on public transport.
The A6-M60 Bypass would link the Airport Road at Hazel Grove with the M60 at Bredbury. It would do great damage to four miles of green belt along the route.
One of Stockport’s treasures, the beautiful Goyt Valley, would be ruined. The valley brings countryside, peace and fresh air to within a mile of the town centre.
A hidden gem, the Poise Brook Valley Nature Reserve, would also be devastated, along with important green space between Offerton and Bosden Farm estates and four wildlife sites (designated Sites of Biological Importance) in Torkington.
The Bypass would bring noise and reduced air quality to areas along its route. Another consequence will be an increased risk of flooding as the climate changes. The Bypass route crosses flood plains of both Poise Brook and the Goyt.
The Bypass would create extra traffic and cause new congestion hotspots (as happened with the M60). This is because:
- New road schemes attract drivers to make journeys that they haven’t made before. Experts call this “induced traffic”. It clogs up many new roads
- Some local roads will get short-term relief relief from the Bypass, but they are likely to fill up again over time
- Seven junctions with traffic lights will cause tailbacks (see map )
- Junctions and roads leading to the Bypass will become congested – like High Lane which is already more jammed up from the new Airport Road
- The new Airport Road itself will become much busier
Stockport needs alternatives to using the car – not more dependency on cars.
The Council’s transport officers published a redrafted Bypass-centred SEMMMS transport policy in May 2018. A consultation on the strategy closed on July 16th 2018. Will people’s views given to that consultation be expressed in the final version? (See SEMMMS Rehash).
The Council reapplied in March 2019 for Bypass money despite a letter from the Roads Minister last year expressing unhappiness about the overall expense of the Bypass and the way Stockport Council officers went about asking for funding for it (- read the Minister’s letterand our commentary).
The Council has inserted the Bypass into Greater Manchester’s transport strategy and Spatial Framework development plan. Transport for the North lists SEMMMS (which includes the Bypass) as a priority scheme. Transport for the North is responsible for deciding which funding applications should go forward for consideration for Government funding.
There is a real danger that the Bypass scheme will get the go-ahead sooner or later despite its ludicrous expense. The Lib Dems, who have a history of being strongly in favour of the Bypass, are expected to take the leadership of Stockport Council from Labour next May.
A magnificent petition of 7,061 signatures opposing the Bypass was presented to Stockport Council in November 2017, when councillors nevertheless voted for preparations for the scheme to continue.
Since then, the Council’s Airport Road A555 has been completed a year behind schedule and with mixed results. Traffic on the new road mostly flows well but at its eastern end there have been a string of accidents and increased congestion on feeder roads, particularly on the A6 in High Lane.
Perhaps councillors will take some lessons from the troubles of the Airport Road. Continuing to put the A6-M60 Bypass at the centre of the SEMMMS transport plans makes the Council’s strategy a lop-sided, unrealistic promotion of outdated 1970s road-building-addicted transport.
(SEMMMS is short for “South East Manchester Multi Modal Study/Strategy”.)
View Councillor Sheila Bailey speaking passionately against the Bypass at the Stockport Cabinet meeting on 14th November 2017. See what the Bypass would do to Stockport’s Goyt Valley at https://goo.gl/EnCunu. Read the latest developments on our NEWS PAGE. Visit our facebook pages: www.facebook.com/GoytValleySOSandGoyt and Poise Valleys SOS. To get more involved, contact us. The first draft of the Council’s SEMMMS Refresh strategy document is here; we have a summary and critique.
The main contents of this website are:
- The A6-M60 Bypass would devastate the wonderful Lower Goyt Valley – which should be one of Stockport’s treasures. The valley brings countryside to within a mile of the town centre. Lower Bredbury and ancient Crookilley Woods would also suffer. Explore the route from Bredbury;
- Another beautiful valley would be severely damaged. It’s a nature reserve and a site of unique geology: Magic in the woods at Poise Brook;
- The Offerton estate, Bosden Farm and the top of Hazel Grove would lose their shield against urban noise and pollution: Precious green spaces from Foggbrook to Torkington;
- Fields and woods including four sites of biological importance would be at risk as the Bypass approaches the A6: Losing fine countryside in Torkington (new article);
- Schools and major roads should not go together, but they would do with the Bypass: Seven schools next to the route;
- The Bypass will not solve Stockport’s traffic problems. It is a plan for trying to deal with the problems of too much car dependency by creating even more: The Bypass won’t work!
- The Bypass’s unbuilt predecessor, the A6(M), is responsible for dangerous J25 junction dysfunction (article rewritten and re-illustrated).
- Stockport Council has just completed one major road scheme. It was a year behind schedule and is likely to break air pollution laws: Bumpy Airport Road (new article);
- Poison air is the biggest killer on the roads. The Bypass would make it worse (new article);
- We have news of what’s happening; and not-so-new news.
- The latest Bypass plans are from 2006 – but only published in 2017: We have added notes to copies of the plans. The source is the Council’s 2006 plans pages 1-9 of Appendix 1 of the Strategic Business Case (which can be magnified for detail).
- We have a examined the first draft of SEMMMS Refresh and its road-building plans: SEMMMS Rehash.
- The Business Case published last year outrageously spun, selected and distorted information to foist an expensive and destructive road on us: see our review of the information appendices and our (lengthy) comments on the main document.
Architect James Dyson has modelled the northern part of the A6-M60 route to show that the land bulldozed would be greater than the official plan shows. The illustration above is his view of the junction next to Dial Park School. The yellow areas show cuttings and earthworks according to the plan; the dark green areas are further areas of land that will need to be taken. See all of James’ model.
Main sources used on this website:
- Full environmental report 2003: SEMMMS Major Road Schemes Stage 2 Environmental Assessment (available from Stockport MBC)
- The route, including both M60 to A6 and A6 to M56: South East Manchester Multi Modal Strategy, Annex E, Appraisal of SEMMMS New Relief Road July 2004 (available from Stockport MBC)
- A6 to Manchester Airport Relief Road Transport Assessment Main Text October 2013 http://a6marr.stockport.gov.uk/746597/760095/760276
- Stockport MBC’s strategy: “SEMMMS new relief road scheme – results and conclusions of initial assessment” October 31, 2003 (can be found by search engines)
- Department for Transport’s Note DFTQ9 – Forecast Usage of the Proposed SEMMMS Relief Road (Freedom of Information request) 2004
- SMBC’s Stage 1 Feasibility Study A6-M60 Relief Road
- SMBC’s Strategic Outline Busines Case for the A6-M60 Relief Road.
Contact our website group to tell us what you think, or to ask to be kept informed or to become more involved.
Apologies if there are adverts here. WordPress gets the money from them, not us.